Legal Opinion
Mission Insurance Group, Inc. v. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 13, 1983No. Civ. 68754PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALSIMER, J.
The central issue presented by this case is whether an insurer who declares a dividend on an expired workers’ compensation insurance policy may be required to account to the insured as to how it determined the amount of such dividend.
Appellant (Merco) purchased from respondent Mission Insurance Company a participating policy of workers’ compensation insurance for the period June 1, 1975, to June 1, 1976. (Respondent Mission Insurance Group, Inc., is the holding company of Mission Insurance Company. Respondents are referred to herein as Mission except where the name of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Racine & Laramie, Ltd. v. Department of Parks & RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Lipton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Security Officers Service, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.