Security Officers Service, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FUKUTO, J.
Does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require a workers’ compensation insurer to defend and resolve claims with due regard to the impact of outstanding claims and reserves on the premiums the insured will be assessed and on policy dividends it may receive? Alleging it had been damaged by defendant State Compensation Insurance Fund’s (SCIF) systematic failure to process claims diligently, and its unreasonable inflation of the reserves assigned to them, plaintiff Security Officers Service, Inc., brought this action for breach of contract and implied covenant,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Lipton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- EFG Bank AG v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.