City of New Bedford v. Lloyd Investment Associates, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
The plaintiff city of New Bedford appeals from an order granting a motion by the defendant Lloyd Investment Associates, Inc., under G. L. c. 231, § 59, for judgment on undisputed facts. The ground of the motion and judgment was that the action was barred by G. L. c. 260, § 2, as appearing in St. 1948, c. 274, § 1, the six-year statute of limitations applicable to “Actions of contract,” as defined.
The plaintiff city’s declaration, in two counts, was in substance as follows. In 1956-1957 the city took the necessary steps by means of “loan orders” Nos. 1 and 2, adopted by the city council and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Kagan v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Clare v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Berezin v. Regency Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.