Legal Opinion

City of New Bedford v. Lloyd Investment Associates, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 1973PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

The plaintiff city of New Bedford appeals from an order granting a motion by the defendant Lloyd Investment Associates, Inc., under G. L. c. 231, § 59, for judgment on undisputed facts. The ground of the motion and judgment was that the action was barred by G. L. c. 260, § 2, as appearing in St. 1948, c. 274, § 1, the six-year statute of limitations applicable to “Actions of contract,” as defined.

The plaintiff city’s declaration, in two counts, was in substance as follows. In 1956-1957 the city took the necessary steps by means of “loan orders” Nos. 1 and 2, adopted by the city council and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Kagan v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Clare v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Berezin v. Regency Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API