Legal Opinion
Berezin v. Regency Savings Bank
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 7, 2000No. 00-1305PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Herbert Berezin appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing his complaint against Regency Savings Bank (“Regency”). Claiming that an error in a promissory note’s recitation of the interest rate resulted in overpayments, Berezin seeks to recover nearly $1 million in interest payments he made to Regency. The district court granted Regency’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), ruling that the “clear and unambiguous” terms of the promissory note precluded consideration of any contrary terms in the commitment letter relied upon by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jorge Correa-Martinez v. Rene Arrillaga-BelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Universal Insurance Company, Hector Manuel Rodriguez-Estrada, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Universal Insurance Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Schott Motorcycle Supply, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Muskat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Estate of Alicano Ayala v. Phillip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- Rojas v. PrincipiDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Pierce v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Riley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.