Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CueiaM

(on rehearing). Defendant was convicted of the crime of bootlegging. In the information she was charged with soiling “one pint of alcohol.” She made a motion in arrest of judgment and, in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion was denied and defendant appeals from the order denying the motion and from the judgment.

The testimony of the state’s witnesses tends to show that on June 12, 1923, two prohibition agents met the defendant apparently by appointment, in a room in a hotel in the city of Fargo, and purchased from her a pint bottle containing a certain liquid. The bottle was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Life Insurance v. PrewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Youmans v. HannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. SchuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. SundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hilmen v. NygaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JagerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. LacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. HusemoenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. JagerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API