Security Mutual Life Insurance v. Prewitt
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham
Motions for rehearing.have been presented by plaintiffs in error. The cases were commenced in the proper state court in Kentucky, and were argued here on their merits in January of this term, and the writs of error were dismissed, 200 U. S. 446, because, as appeared from the record, only abstract questions remained to be decided, the licenses to do business within the State of Kentucky in both cases, which had been granted. on July 1, 1904, for one' year, having expired since issuing the writs of error.
In No. 178 the petition stated that the permission or authority to continue to do business…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Marvine Markham v. City of Newport News, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.