Legal Opinion

State v. Husemoen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The defendant was convicted for “selling intoxicating liquor, to wit: moonshine whisky.” lie appeals from the judgment of conviction. He assigns some forty-three specifications of error. Nearly all of these are directed against rulings on questions of evidence. His main reliance, however, is on the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction.

The chief witnesses for the state, Eckness, Lemieux, Leist, and Bot, were young men who worked as farm hands in Ransom county. One night they set out to drive to a country dance. On the way Eckness and the driver of the car left…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Leach v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. MoellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Felton v. Midland Continental RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. McCartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API