Legal Opinion

Fenner v. Bolema Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1951No. Docket 34, Calendar 44,981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of $1,730.72, entered on jury verdict, for services rendered by plaintiff. Defendant had a contract with the city of Muskegon for construction of a sewer. It entered into an arrangement with plaintiff under which it agreed to pay plaintiff at the rate of $5 per hour for a bucket and crane and 1 operator to do excavating on the job. Plaintiff testified that the agreement included the provision that excavating was to be done between sheeting; that when the job was begun difficulties and delays were encountered in placing the sheeting so that defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stadler v. CiprianMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fricke v. ForbesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Burr's Damascus Tool Works v. Peninsular Tool Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Mundhenk v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Palmerlee v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patalano v. ChabotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Siebring Manufacturing Co. v. Carlson Hybrid Corn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. R. M. Taylor, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. Nelson v. WitteMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. R. M. Taylor v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API