Legal Opinion

Fricke v. Forbes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1940No. Docket No. 104, Calendar No. 40,855PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Each of these litigants claimed an unliquidated indebtedness from the other but did not agree as to the balance which plaintiff claimed was due to her. At least two or three unsuccessful attempts were made to adjust their differences and fix definitely the amount due from defendant to plaintiff. Finally, on May 14, 1938, a settlement was reached, obviously by way of compromise. The agreed balance due from defendant to plaintiff was $31.82, and each of the parties signed a written memorandum worded as follows: “Balance due $31.82, May 14, 1938.” Plaintiff claims that defendant promised to pay…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Breitung v. LindauerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Henderson v. McRaeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Stadler v. CiprianMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Shubert v. RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edleman v. Gleason (In Re Silver Mill Frozen Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  2. Capps v. Georgia Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ortiz v. Travelers Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Vermett v. HoughDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
  5. Hoffman v. BurkhammerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API