Burr's Damascus Tool Works v. Peninsular Tool Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Burr’s Damascus Tool Works against the Peninsular Tool Manufacturing Company and others for libel. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Tbe parties to this action were rival manufacturers of molder’s tools, and both claimed the right to the use of the name “ Burr ” in connection with their products. The matter was tried out in a chancery cause, commenced by the defendant in this case, which resulted in a decree being rendered in behalf of the defendant in that case, plaintiff here. Thereupon plaintiff addressed a circular to its patrons and the public, informing them that a decree had been granted, giving it the sole right to use the names “ Burr” and “Burr’s Damascus,” and warning against tools so marked by others. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Hosler v. HurshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Steketee v. KimmMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- White v. GraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
- Browning v. CrouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Stadler v. CiprianMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Nash v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Fricke v. ForbesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Bowerman v. Detroit Free PressMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.