Legal Opinion

People v. Curley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCUDDER, J.

In what appears to be a case of first impression at the appellate level, defendant contends that he completed his sentence upon a 1977 conviction of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [1]) in 1992, and thus he is not subject to the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law art 6-C), which was not effective until January 1996. Pursuant to SORA, the sentencing court must determine whether an offender is “a sex offender or a sexually violent predator” and must further determine a level of notification prior to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roballo v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. NievesNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. RobersonNew York Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. WorthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. State v. RashidNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. MerejildoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API