State v. Rashid
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel P. Conviser, J.
Respondent Mustafa Rashid is the subject of a petition for sex offender civil management pursuant to article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law. He moves here to dismiss the petition. Civil management under article 10 requires a finding that the respondent is a “detained sex offender” who “suffers from a mental abnormality.” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [q]; § 10.07 [d].) Respondent does not seek dismissal on the basis that he does not suffer from a mental abnormality or on the basis that he was not previously convicted of a sex crime. Rather, he claims that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of New York v. RashidNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. NievesNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- State of New York v. RashidNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.