Legal Opinion

State v. Rashid

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel P. Conviser, J.

Respondent Mustafa Rashid is the subject of a petition for sex offender civil management pursuant to article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law. He moves here to dismiss the petition. Civil management under article 10 requires a finding that the respondent is a “detained sex offender” who “suffers from a mental abnormality.” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [q]; § 10.07 [d].) Respondent does not seek dismissal on the basis that he does not suffer from a mental abnormality or on the basis that he was not previously convicted of a sex crime. Rather, he claims that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of New York v. RashidNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. NievesNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State of New York v. RashidNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API