People v. Roberson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ronald H. Tills, J.
By application dated December 31, 1996, the defendant, by his attorney Daniel P. Grasso, Esq., seeks to dismiss the proceedings classifying the defendant as a sex offender under Correction Law § 168, referred to as the Sex Offender Registration Act. Defendant presents arguments in two areas, that the classification and notification provisions violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution and that the Sex Offender Registration Act is not applicable to the defen*487dant herein based upon the reasons set forth in the affidavit of counsel.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- People v. CurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- State v. RashidNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1997