Legal Opinion
People v. Frank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), dated October 13, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court properly determined that he is subject to the requirements of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. VaughnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. AndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HegazyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ParillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. ParillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013