Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. Ware

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1980No. 80-76PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is, an appeal from a Columbia County Chancery decree cancelling an oil and gas lease that the appellant,. Amoco Production Company, had been granted by C. O. “Jack” Ware and others.

The chancellor, found;that the lease should be. cancelled because Amoco had breached implied covenants of the lease, had failed to act in good faith and had abandoned the interests of the lessors.

■ On appeal, Amoco raises four allegations of error, essentially árguing that the chancellor was wrong in'his findings. Wé agree with Amoco that the court was in error in cancel-ling the lease…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poindexter v. Lion Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Saulsberry v. SiegelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Klein v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Byrd v. BradhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API