Amoco Production Co. v. Ware
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
This is, an appeal from a Columbia County Chancery decree cancelling an oil and gas lease that the appellant,. Amoco Production Company, had been granted by C. O. “Jack” Ware and others.
The chancellor, found;that the lease should be. cancelled because Amoco had breached implied covenants of the lease, had failed to act in good faith and had abandoned the interests of the lessors.
■ On appeal, Amoco raises four allegations of error, essentially árguing that the chancellor was wrong in'his findings. Wé agree with Amoco that the court was in error in cancel-ling the lease…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Poindexter v. Lion Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Saulsberry v. SiegelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Klein v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Byrd v. BradhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.