Tatum v. Levi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEY, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff in this action brought suit against the defendants for the specific performance of an option contract for the sale of real estate, with an alternative prayer for damages for violation of the contract. The defendant Adolph Levi filed a cross-complaint on the fifteenth day of May, 1928, alleging that the option contract was a contract for purchase and sale and that the cross-complainant offered on the sixth day of April, 1928, to convey the property to the plaintiff, but that the plaintiff refused to accept the offer, and prayed for the specific performance of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Whisenant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Hunt v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Myers v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cook v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936