Legal Opinion
Ryan v. General MacHine Products
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 2003No. Civil Action 02-1281PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BAYLSON, District Judge.
This case arises out of allegations made by plaintiff Shirley Ryan (“Plaintiff”) against defendant General Machine Products (“GMP” or “Defendant”), that she had been sexually harassed by a supervisor, Gary Miller, during August 2001. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is not directed to that harassment claim but rather to Plaintiffs claims regarding gender discrimination in training, promotions, and equal pay under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. §…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Klump v. Nazareth Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Homel v. Centennial School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Zuurbier v. Medstar Health, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.