Legal Opinion
Homel v. Centennial School District
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 21, 2011No. Civil Action No. 11-1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAVAGE, District Judge.
In her meandering “shotgun complaint,” 1 Sandy Homel makes claims based on a multitude of legal theories against her former employer, Centennial School District (“CSD”). She alleges First Amendment retaliation under § 1983; sex discrimination under § 1983, Title VII, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA); retaliation for filing sex discrimination complaints under Title VII and the PHRA; and age discrimination under the ADEA and the PHRA. Each of her counts incorporates by reference all the allegations of its predecessors, leaving to us the…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frintner v. TruepositionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Andersen v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Murphy v. Center for Emergency Medicine of Western Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- BENNETT v. SEPTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BRICKHOUSE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.