Legal Opinion

Almond v. Bell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2008No. 28495Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

Appellants (“defendants”) 1 owned a subdivision lot and were building a home on it. Alleging she was “lawfully possessed of an Easement” to operate a community water system on the same lot, respondent (“plaintiff’) obtained an injunction in her favor. We cannot sustain the judgment as it is unsupported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976); Harris v. Brown, 218 S.W.3d 630, 632 (Mo.App.2007). Accordingly, we reverse.

Facts and Background

Kirkwood Heights Subdivision was platted in rural Butler County in the 1940s. The developers put a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Allen Quarries, Inc. v. AugeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Harris v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API