Legal Opinion

Harris v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 2007No. 27759PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

Appellant (Plaintiff) and Respondents (Defendants) were litigating a property dispute involving various claims and counterclaims. After extensive negotiations at a pre-trial conference, the parties announced “a stipulation for settlement, in principle,” and made a record on some of the terms. The attorneys told the trial court an additional meeting might be needed to work out “minute details,” and a written settlement agreement would be prepared for the court’s approval.

A month later, Defendants moved to enforce the settlement agreement. They attached a ten-page…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Randall v. HarmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Almond v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API