Legal Opinion

Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 2007No. 27690PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

Bethany J. Miller (defendant) appeals a judgment for Citibank (S.D.) N.A. (Citibank) in a suit Citibank brought as an action on account. The trial court found that Citibank’s evidence was not sufficient to prove an action on account; however, it concluded that the evidence was sufficient to prove an action for account stated and entered judgment for Citibank on that basis. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in two respects: (1) that the theory of account stated was not before the trial court; and (2) even so, Citibank’s evidence was insufficient to prove a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Mehra v. MehraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Norman v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Faught v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. M.F.M. v. J.O.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen Quarries, Inc. v. AugeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Wheelhouse Marina Real Estate, L.L.C. v. BommaritoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Brand v. Kansas City Gastroenterology & Hepatology, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. EDUCAP, INC. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Almond v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API