Page v. Sackett
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Pottavoattamie Circuit Court. • Action to recover damages for the wrongful use of a trademark for flour, and for other wrongs. Plaintiffs dismissed their action, and subsequently defendants filed an amendment to their answer, setting up a counter-claim, and separate answers, setting up separate counter-claims in favor of the defendants severally. These separate answers and amended answer were stricken from the files on motion of plaintiffs. Defendants aj>peal.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The original answer of defendants, among other defenses, sets up a counter-claim for damages accruing to them on account of the violation of a contract by plaintiffs to furnish flour to defendants. The plaintiff’s filed with their petition numerous interrogatories to he answered by *227defendants. Exceptions were taken to them by defendants, two only of which were sustained. The defendants did not answer the interrogatories held good by the court. The plaintiffs in vacation dismissed their action. At the next term defendants -filed an amendment to their answer, setting up a counter-claim in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bardes v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Sorensen Ex Rel. Sorensen v. Shaklee Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Eclipse Lumber Co. v. City of WaukonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- White v. National Bondholders Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Hickman v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.