Legal Opinion

White v. National Bondholders Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion granted. In the absence of special circumstances a defendant cannot compel the plaintiff to prosecute an action against his will; it is only when substantial rights of a defendant have accrued that the court will refuse plaintiff a discontinuance of the action. This rule is well established.

Where a counterclaim is interposed, the court will decline to permit a discontinuance and will continue the action to enable the defendant to prosecute the counterclaim and obtain an adjudication thereof; likewise, where a defense is pleaded, the determination of which involves substantial rights.

•.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. SackettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Hickman v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Laxer v. Bergen & Zaager, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Laxer v. Bergen & Zaager, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Felice v. St. Agnes HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Newman v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Edelman v. EdelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Eugenia VI Venture Holdings, Ltd. v. MapleWood Equity Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Wildeb Rest. Inc. v. Jolin Restaurant, Inc.Suffolk County District Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API