White v. National Bondholders Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Motion granted. In the absence of special circumstances a defendant cannot compel the plaintiff to prosecute an action against his will; it is only when substantial rights of a defendant have accrued that the court will refuse plaintiff a discontinuance of the action. This rule is well established.
Where a counterclaim is interposed, the court will decline to permit a discontinuance and will continue the action to enable the defendant to prosecute the counterclaim and obtain an adjudication thereof; likewise, where a defense is pleaded, the determination of which involves substantial rights.
•.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Page v. SackettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Hickman v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Laxer v. Bergen & Zaager, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
- Laxer v. Bergen & Zaager, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Felice v. St. Agnes HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Newman v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Edelman v. EdelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Eugenia VI Venture Holdings, Ltd. v. MapleWood Equity Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Wildeb Rest. Inc. v. Jolin Restaurant, Inc.Suffolk County District Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.