Legal Opinion

Sorensen Ex Rel. Sorensen v. Shaklee Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1990No. 89-960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

May plaintiffs dismiss their tort suit without prejudice after defendant’s motion for summary judgment has been submitted, but not yet ruled upon? The question turns on whether a summary judgment proceeding is a trial under Iowa rule of civil procedure 215. The trial court determined that it is and voided plaintiffs’ attempt to dismiss their suit. We reverse.

Plaintiffs are parents of two severely retarded children. On behalf of the children they brought this products liability suit against defendant Shaklee Corporation, the manufacturer of alfalfa tablets which both parents…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Stern Finance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Stanwood Feed & Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Orr v. Iowa Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Eclipse Lumber Co. v. City of WaukonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Page v. SackettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Burlington Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Sorensen v. Shaklee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. William Davis and Regina Davis v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. And Gina M. BenzshawelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Sorensen ex rel. Dunbar v. Shaklee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Dull v. Iowa District Court for Woodbury CountyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API