Legal Opinion
Hormel Foods Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 23, 1996No. 3-96-135PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a declaratory judgment action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, et seq. Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment respecting the rights and obligations of the parties under a contract of insurance. For the following reasons the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part both motions.
BACKGROUND
This case arises from a fatal accident sustained by an employee of Quality Pork Products (QPP), which is not a party to this action. Plaintiff Hormel leases a hog processing facility to QPP. The facility was constructed in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nabisco, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murray v. Greenwich InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Colony Ins. Co. v. Pinewoods Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
- Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- SFH, Inc. v. Millard Refrigerated Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Mikki Murray v. Greenwich Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.