Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1981No. 8126SC513Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with the admission of the testimony as to Homer’s actions. Several cases in this jurisdiction have dealt with the admission into evidence of the actions of bloodhounds. See State v. Irick, 291 N.C. 480, 231 S.E. 2d 833 (1977); State v. Rowland, 263 N.C. 353, 139 S.E. 2d 661 (1965); State v. McLeod, 196 N.C. 542, 146 S.E. 409 (1929) and State v. Hawley, --- N.C. App. ---, --- S.E. 2d --- (1981). Each of these cases has stated the rule as follows:

“It is fully recognized in this jurisdiction that the actions of bloodhounds may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. . McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. State v. . OakleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. MarzeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API