State v. Marze
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CARSON, Judge.
Able counsel for the defendant vigorously contends that a judgment as of nonsuit should have been entered at the conclusion of the State’s evidence and again at the conclusion of all the evidence. On a motion for nonsuit, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of any reasonable inferences which arise therefrom. State v. McNeil, 280 N.C. 159, 185 S.E. 2d 156 (1971) ; State v. Bronson, 10 N.C. App. 638, 179 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). Applying that test to the facts of the instant situation, it is clear that the evidence is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. PinyatelloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. LanierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982