Legal Opinion

State v. . Oakley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

At the close of the State’s evidence, and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant made motions in the court below for judgment of nonsuit. N. 0. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 4643. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.

N. O. Code, supra, sec. 4232, is as follows: “There shall be two degrees in the crime of burglary as defined at the common law. If the crime be committed in a dwelling house, or in a room used as a sleeping apartment in any building, and any person is in the actual occupation of any part of said dwelling house or sleeping apartment at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  2. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Fourth National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Morris v. Kramer Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BlackstockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. HedrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API