Legal Opinion

State v. . McLeod

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1929PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROGDEN, J., dissenting. after stating the case: The prisoner stressfully contends that his motion for judgment of nonsuit, made first at the close of the State's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence, should have been allowed, but we are of opinion that the case is one calling for a jury verdict. The motion to dismiss under C. S., 4643, requires that the court ascertain merely whether there is any evidence to sustain the allegations of the indictment, and not whether it be true or the jury should believe it. S. v. Lawrence, post, 562.

True, the evidence is circumstantial, but…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  3. Wittkowsky v. WassonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API