Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. McLean
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
JOHN W. LORD, Jr., District Judge.
After a trial before the Court without a jury, upon pleadings and proof, the Court makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Connecticut with its principal place of business there.
2. Defendant, John J. McLean, an individual, is a citizen of Pennsylvania residing in this District at 390 Rittenhouse Street, Norristown, Pennsylvania.
3. The amount in controversy exceeds $10,000 exclusive of interest and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kribbs v. JACKSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Main Investment Co. v. GisolfiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Fox v. CoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- American Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. U.R.L., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Comte Guy Dubern v. Girard Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Levin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Comte Guy Dubern v. Girard Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972