Legal Opinion

Main Investment Co. v. Gisolfi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1964No. Appeals, Nos. 13 and 18PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an action in replevin brought by Main Investment Company (Main), a New Jersey finance company, authorized to do business in the State of Pennsylvania, against Anthony J. Gisolfi, a resident of Scranton, Pennsylvania, to obtain possession of a 1961 Chevrolet Impala convertible automobile. After the case was submitted to the court on the pleadings, consisting of complaint, answer with new matter, and reply, and on an agreed statement of facts, the court awarded the automobile to Gisolfi but denied to him an award for damages. Both parties have appealed.

The facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Sterling Acceptance Co. v. GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Cox v. BurdettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Franklin Investment Co. v. HomburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Finance America Commercial Corp. v. Econo Coach, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Al Maroone Ford, Inc. v. Manheim Auto Auction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Stroman v. Orlando Bank & Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Wilson v. Highway Service MarinelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API