Legal Opinion

McKesson v. Sherman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Walworth County. Defendants appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtObton, J.

This is an action of replevin for the recovery of *305a fast trotting horse, known as Billy Basteder, or Charley Eord, of the alleged value of $6,000. The defendants jointly answer, denying the title of the plaintiff, and alleging the ownership of the horse in themselves. The defendant Reynolds makes separate answer, that they purchased the horse of one Charles M. Ford, of the state of Ohio, who claimed to be its owner, and that the plaintiff represented to them that he had sold it to said Ford, and that Ford was the lawful owner, and that thereupon the horse was delivered to them by the express…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fellows v. GilhuberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CatheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Richardson v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. T. & H. Smith & Co. v. ThesmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Zielke v. London Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API