Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1990No. C3-89-1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Relator Moorhead State University seeks review of an order by the Department of Human Rights determining that Moorhead discriminated against a former probationary employee based on sex. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 1987, the respondent Department of Human Rights issued a complaint charging relator Moorhead State University with sex discrimination. The Department’s complaint was based upon allegations by Janice Hanstine, a former probationary groundskeeper, who had been terminated by Moorhead at the conclusion of her six-month probationary period.
The Department’s complaint was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- City of Minneapolis v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Melsha v. Wickes Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Evans v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Fahey v. Avnet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990