Legal Opinion

James Talcott, Inc. v. Associates Discount Corp.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided April 20, 1961No. LR 60 C 78PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, District Judge.

This is an action to replevin an Insley dragline. Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1958) has been established. The cause was tried to the Court sitting without a jury on February 27, 1961; upon consideration of the pre-trial briefs of the parties, the evidence adduced at trial, and the briefs submitted after trial, I have decided that the plaintiff cannot prevail and accordingly find in favor of the defendants.

The McConnells are merely nominal parties to this action as they hold possession of the machine in question subject to the determination of title and the right…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coffman v. Citizens' Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Kirkpatrick Finance Co. v. StottsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Securities Investment Co. of St. Louis v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talarico v. United Furniture Workers Pension Fund ADistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
  2. James Talcott, Inc. v. Associates Discount Corporation and Mr. And Mrs. F. O. McConnell D/B/A McConnell Heavy HaulingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API