Legal Opinion
Coffman v. Citizens' Loan & Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 14, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). At the outset, it may be stated that, under the practice in equity, exhibits to a complaint become, for all purposes of pleading, a part of the complaint, and consequently on demurrer may be used in aid of a defective statement in the complaint itself, and may he looked to for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the allegations of the complaint. Moore v. Exelby, 170 Ark. 908..
It is fairly inferable from the allegations in the cross-complaint, when read in ■connection with the exhibits thereto, that the Yale Automobile Company was a dealer in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Moore v. ExelbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Lund v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Gauss Sons v. Doyle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zendman v. Harry Winston, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- James Talcott, Inc. v. Associates Discount Corporation and Mr. And Mrs. F. O. McConnell D/B/A McConnell Heavy HaulingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Buchanan v. Commercial Investment TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- People v. EtzlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Daas v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.