Legal Opinion

Fraass Surgical Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 20, 1974No. 343-73PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

In this case involving three defense supply contracts, plaintiff, Fraass Surgical Manufacturing Company, Inc., presents a three-count petition for relief:

Comit I is a request for reformation of contract to relieve plaintiff of liability for destruction of government property lost in a fire on plaintiff’s premises.

Count II seeks mitigation under the contracts of the amount of plaintiff’s alleged liability to the government.

Oount III asserts that the money which plaintiff ultimately paid to defendant was paid under mistake of fact or law and that plaintiff is, accordingly, entitled to repayment.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Brock & Blevins Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Brock & Blevins Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nrm Corporation v. Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. S.E.R., Jobs for Progress, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. American Ship Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API