Legal Opinion

Wilkes v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 2010No. A09-435PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s order sustaining revocation of his driver’s license in an implied-consent proceeding. Appellant argues that the district court (1) erred in concluding that the officer had a reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop appellant based on traffic-law violations, and (2) abused its discretion in failing to view the scene of the traffic stop. Because appellant’s driving conduct and the totality of the circumstances support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity and because the district court did not abuse its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sarber v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. DoebelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Rita Dolores Illi v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Jon Earl Miller v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API