Wilkes v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order sustaining revocation of his driver’s license in an implied-consent proceeding. Appellant argues that the district court (1) erred in concluding that the officer had a reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop appellant based on traffic-law violations, and (2) abused its discretion in failing to view the scene of the traffic stop. Because appellant’s driving conduct and the totality of the circumstances support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity and because the district court did not abuse its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sarber v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. DoebelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Rita Dolores Illi v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Jon Earl Miller v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.