People v. Quiel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The appellant and Lowell Bell were jointly charged and convicted of petty theft and prior convictions of felonies. They were tried with a jury. The appellant admitted the prior conviction of felony. A motion for new trial was granted the defendant Bell, but denied as to the appellant, who was thereupon sentenced to state prison for the indeterminate term- prescribed by law. From that judgment and order denying a new trial Joe Y. Quiel appealed.
It is contended the verdict and judgment are not supported by the evidence; that the court erred in denying appellant’s motion for new trial, and that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. TijerinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.