Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 5, 1984No. 11228-7-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Raymond E. and Marilyn Thayer (Thayer), subsequent purchasers of land, against Winifred M. Thompson and her stepchildren (Thompson), sellers, to determine the validity of a restrictive covenant in a real estate contract. The covenant provides: "No buildings nor improvements shall be constructed or placed upon Lot 11, Block 10, above described . . without the prior consent of seller, his heirs or assigns, in writing." The trial court found that the covenant was valid and enforceable and dismissed Thayer's complaint. Thayer appeals, contending…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Burton v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lenhoff v. Birch Bay Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Viking Properties, Inc. v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Shafer v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Lakes at Mercer Island Homeowners Ass'n v. WitrakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API