Legal Opinion

Babbitt v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1997No. 95-3924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

104 F.3d 89

BABBITT, et al., Plaintiffs,

Fred Muzu Saleem (94-4147); Charles R. Lutz (95-3208);

James E. Poole (95-3210); Richard L. Hammond (95-3924);

Collie Poole, Jr. (95-3925); Burl E. Stevenson, Jr.

(95-3929); C.A. Burdge (95-3965), Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 94-4147, 95-3208, 95-3210, 95-3924, 95-3925, 95-3929

and 95-3965.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Sept. 17, 1996.

Decided Jan. 2, 1997.

Mark T. Coulter (argued and briefed), Robert N. Peirce, Jr. & Associates, Pittsburg, PA, and Steve C. Foley, Robert E. Sweeney &…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SchubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jaqua v. Canadian National RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Loyal v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Cole v. Norfolk Southern RailwaySupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  4. Donna Payne, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Neil Harrah v. BNSF Railway Company, (Individually and as Successor-In Interest to the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, Atchison and Quincy Railroad Company, Burlington Northern, Inc., and Burlington Northern Railroad Company), Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API