Jaqua v. Canadian National Railroad
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAAD, EJ.
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
The railroad employer’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of summary disposition on plaintiffs claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 USC 51 et seq., raises a question of the permissible scope of releases under FELA. Section 5 of FELA prohibits a railroad from requiring employees to sign agreements that allow the railroad to escape liability imposed under the act. But the United States Supreme Court has also ruled that § 5 does not prevent an employer from settling a specific claim and controversy with an employee. The narrow question here…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. CarpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sinclair v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Ratliff v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Blackwell v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Cole v. Norfolk Southern RailwaySupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.