Legal Opinion
Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Michigan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 29, 2000No. 99-3924PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Christopher J. Parry, appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants, Mohawk Motors (“Mohawk”), Austintown Ambulatory ER (“Austintown”), MedEx-press, and Drug Free, Inc. (“Drug Free”) and denying Plaintiffs motion to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff claims that the district court erred by (1) denying him leave to amend his complaint to include a Bivens claim; (2) concluding that he did not have a private cause of action under the regulations promulgated pursuant to the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Doctor Fred L. Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- John George v. Youngstown State Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Mx Group, Inc. v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- D.E. & J Ltd. Partnership v. ConawayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.