Legal Opinion

Toone v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1926No. 16142PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the city court of Muskogee, Okla., by G. C. Toone, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, against George Walker, defendant in error, W. V. Pugh, and Bill Cain, defendants below, to replevin one Ford roadster of the value of $150. The case was dismissed as to'W. V. Pugh and Bill Cain. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the lower court.

Judgment was rendered in the city court in favor of the defendant George Walker, from which judgment the plaintiff appealed to the district court of Muskogee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Crisp v. Gillespey, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Potts v. RubesamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Armstrong v. WassonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Arkansas City v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Koch Engineering Co. v. FaulconerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Payne v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Hildebrand v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Vacuum Oil Co. v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API