Legal Opinion
Vacuum Oil Co. v. Quigg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 4, 1927No. 17714PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIASON, V. C. J.
This action, which was in the nature of a creditor’s bill, was brought by the Vacuum Oil Company, a corporation, against Frank E. Quigg, Nellie E. Quigg, S. C. F'rost, and the First National Bank of Bixby, Okla., for the purpose of setting aside certain transfers and incum-brances of real estate by the defendants, alleged to have been fraudulent and made without consideration and for the purpose of avoiding payment of indebtedness owing by the defendant Frank E. Quigg to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff alleged that on October 30, 1925, it recovered a judgment against the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Oklahoma Nat. Bank v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Culp v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Toone v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Crisp v. Gillespey, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Harry v. HertzlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- James P. Neill v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. GrosecloseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lynn v. BrennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.