Legal Opinion

MacMillan v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff had the power to revoke the grant contained in a voluntary trust agreement previously executed by her without consideration.

The North Carolina statute declaring the conditions under which a trust agreement may be revoked is C. S., 996, as amended by ch. 305, Public Laws 1929. From this we quote the 'following pertinent provision: “The grantor, maker or trustor who has heretofore created or may hereafter create a voluntary trust estate in real or personal property for the use and benefit of himself or of any other person or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Stanback v. Citizens National Bank of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. MacRae v. Commerce Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Durner v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Durner v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cavett v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Pinkham v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Pinkham v. Unborn Children of PinkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Atchison v. DietrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Randolph v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF OKL. COLLEGESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API