Durner v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Civil action to revoke gratuitous or voluntary trust, which, it is alleged, has proven to be ill-advised, improvident, and impossible of fulfillment.
From a decree terminating the trust, it appearing that the allegations of the petition are abundantly supported by the evidence and so found by the court, the Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company, as it feels in duty bound to do, appeals, assigning errors. Affirmed on authority of Bell v. McCoin, 184 N.C. 117, 113 S.E. 561. The cases of McRae v. Trust Co., 199 N.C. 714, 155 S.E. 614, Stanbackv. Bank, 197 N.C. 292, 148 S.E. 313, and Anderson v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Anderson v. . WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Stanback v. Citizens National Bank of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- MacRae v. Commerce Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Bell v. . McCoinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramsey v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- MacMillan v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942