Pinkham v. Unborn Children of Pinkham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
To fully understand what is involved in this appeal, and the basis of decision, it is necessary to refer chronologically to legislation in this State permitting and regulating revocation of future interests conveyed by voluntary deeds to persons not in esse. Changes in the law during the course of the transactions under review have to do with their validity and are challenged by the plaintiffs as infringing rights pro*75tected by tbe Constitution when applied to the power of revocation they now seek to assert. The original grant of the power of revocation must be interpreted, defined and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- People's Loan & Exchange Bank v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Stanback v. Citizens National Bank of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Jennings v. CapenIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Anderson v. AssimosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State ex rel. Washington State Sportsmen's Council, Inc. v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Anderson v. AssimosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.