Legal Opinion

Durner v. Hood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

Affirmed on authority of Bell v. McCoin, 184 N. C., 117, 113 S. E., 561. Tbe cases of McRae v. Trust Co., 199 N. C., 714, 155 S. E., 614, Stanback v. Bank, 197 N. C., 292, 148 S. E., 313, and Anderson v. Wilkins, 142 N. C., 154, 55 S. E., 272, are also cited by petitioner as supporting in tendency tbe judgment.

Affirmed.

Schenck, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Anderson v. . WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Stanback v. Citizens National Bank of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. MacRae v. Commerce Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Bell v. . McCoinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacMillan v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942