Legal Opinion

Rost v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1996No. 20511PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing in a proceeding under Rule 24.035.1 Appellant’s sole point relied on avers the motion court clearly erred in denying relief in that:

“... Appellant was subjected to multiple punishment for the same, offense in violation of his right to be free from double jeopardy as established by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in that he was convicted of assault in the second degree and the lesser included offense of driving while intoxicated.”

While that appears to be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ivy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. GaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. MarkhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. TilleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Bass v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API