Legal Opinion

State v. Tilley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2003No. 24804PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

A jury found James Tilley (“Defendant”) guilty of attempting to manufacture methamphetamine (§ 195.211), possession of methamphetamine (§ 195.202), and possession of precursor ingredients for methamphetamine with the intent to manufacture that drug (§ 195.420). 1 Because he was proven to be a prior and persistent offender, the trial judge imposed sentence.

Defendant appeals and presents issues about the following: (1) defense counsel’s alleged conflict of interest arising from his representation of a co-defendant; (2) sufficiency of the evidence to support Count I (§…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. PurleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. State v. NicklassonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State v. TolliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. CloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vulgamott v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Shifkowski v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. MahsmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Tilley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API